Adam vs. Eve

Contributed by Dr. Alicia La Hoz, FB Program Director & Clinical Psychologist

I wasn’t at all surprised upon reading the new study released by the Pew Research Center on the new economics of marriage, http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1466/economics-marriage-rise-of-wives, declaring that women now outpace man both in income and education. For a while now, we have known that at least in practice more equalitarian gender roles have been endorsed by married couples – basically men have been pulling their own weight by doing their fare share of household chores. I wonder if this trend is at all tied  to the economic and educational shift reported in the Pew Research. Other studies seem to tie gender role reversals to these factors. What I am especially curious to see is how these role reversals will impact not only our marriages but how it will define roles in future generations.

Social scientists are willing to only accept gender differences when understood as socially learned phenomena – as a learned trait. For example, men learn not to be too emotional when they are told not to cry as children and women are encouraged as children to speak freely about emotions. Following this reasoning, traditional men gender roles are perceived as logical, analytical, providers, competitive and women as nurturing, relational, multi-taskers, emotional. If these gender traits - which were needed in order to function in a society that demanded them according to gender expectation - have been passed on for generations and learned as a survival tactic, then will these familiar gender traits change for our children who are being raised in homes that are significantly different than decades ago? Will these gender traits be more fluid since the business women will now have evolved into being more analytical, logical, and competitive and stay at home dads as more nurturing?

Whatever the outcome, for now what I take away from this is that in order to avoid having World War III erupt over who’s going to the laundry in your home, gender expectations need to be openly discussed. In my own marriage which is experimenting with these role reversals, I can attest that having ongoing discussions about household responsibilities with an eye on gender expectations has been immensely helpful.

Before you begin having these dicussions, check out this entertaining and light-hearted presentation by Mark Gungor (who coincidently will be at our Chicago Theatre event in July) highlighting the differences between men and women.

3 Comments to “Adam vs. Eve”

  1. It is high time that this topic has come to public light. Family life is so much richer when fathers interact more fully with their children. My father used to brag about how he never once changed a diaper for any of his ten children. All of his offspring were horrified to hear this and imagined what that must have felt like to Mom. Once the gender stereotypes are opened up and looked at, couples can have more mobility in the relationship. Won’t that be healthier for our kids to see? Won’t that help them see that there are no limits whether you are born male or female. I think each couple can define these things for themselves. Bill Gates tells us that ‘innovations” are necessary for recovery in our country. Breaking down gender differences leads to understanding which I believe is innovative for relationships and marriages. Let’s talk more about it.

  2. I agree, this is an important topic of conversation. My husband and I have also had several conversations around the changing roles of men and women as we find ourselves having to think more creatively about how we balance our lives and childcare since we are both working professionals. I especially wonder how this will shift the roles of fathers in the future. Right now the literature on fatherhood suggests that the prototype for men is changing to be one of shared parenting and increased nurturing. My own research and conversations with men, though, have shown that they still feel a good amount of pressure to provide financially for the family and in a sense feel pulled in many directions to fulfill many more roles than fathers of the past. It’s interesting to me that this is the same struggle I hear from a lot of working mothers who feel pressure to be a “superwoman” who does it all. I wonder if perhaps women have actually experienced more flexibility in their roles over the past couple of decades with the increased presence of women’s rights movements. It could be that this shift from provider only will be a challenging one for many fathers. Either way, it will be interesting to see the long term influences on gender-related characteristics. I hope that we will also see increasing flexibility in our society, especially in work places, so that both parents feel the freedom to be equally involved in parenting while also leading fulfilling professional lives if they choose to do so.

  3. You go, Alicia – this shift is very significant and may signal some new freedom for both women and men to be involved in careers and family-life in new ways. Of course, it probably will also impact other areas of family life in ways we might not be expecting. What I’ve been wondering about is the longer-term impact of this change in gender roles on fertility rates and on whether or not structural change on the societal level will occur in the United States, offering more support to parents who are balancing two careers, like the changes we have seen in Europe. An interesting demographic study in both East and West Germany (http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/39/19-39.pdf) found that although fertility behavior results from an interplay of many factors, more egalitarian couples had lower rate of childbirth over-all. This is not surprising as women in non-patriarchal partnerships who do not value children might find other life-styles more appealing. The study also found that the value women placed on having children had a larger impact on a couple’s decision to have a child in more egalitarian marriages than that of men. The author then speculates that the decision to have a child would require careful negotiation between the partners in more equitable marriages–additional communication challenges certainly, and a negotiation likely to carry more risks for women than men of either becoming dependent or of disrupting the partnership. Or maybe, as Mark Gungor says, it’s not because of these reasons at all but instead because of the differences in male and female brains– because men live in their “nothing box” and “don’t care” while women “care about EVERYTHING!” Hilarious! It will be interesting to watch as this change and its impact on couples, families, and the broader society unfolds. Anybody else have an idea about how this change may impact life as we know it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.